I refuse to walk on eggshells when doing philosophy.
If I say something that offends you, or hurts your feelings, well...
that's just too damn bad.
I refuse to walk on eggshells when doing philosophy.
If I say something that offends you, or hurts your feelings, well...
that's just too damn bad.
I'm getting really tired of hearing the following:
{This may be updated from time to time}
Analytic: We can't see the forest for the trees.
Post-Analytic: Here, let me show you how to see the forest...
Continental: OOOHHH...Look at the pretty forest!
Constructionist: 'Tree' and 'Forest' are just social constructs.
Deconstructionist: There is no forest without the trees, and there are no trees without the nuts...
Feminist: A tree is a phallic symbol, and a forest is a sign of male domination.
Supervenist: The forest is real but will disappear if we cut down the trees.
Reductionist: The forest is nothing over and above the sum of the trees.
Eliminativist: What forest?
Dualist: There are two things; the forest, and the trees.
Panpsychist: The forest is a living entity!
Neutral Monist: No, not trees, not a forest, but something else entirely different.
Relativist: You are all correct, but speaking past each other.